Rank fillers on uptake weighed in the working mixture, not inferred from flux.

Membranes · PMC-1 / EMC-2 (paramagnetic)

The indirect method

Three places the by-difference number lets you down.

01
Filler sorption characterised dry, then assumed to hold in the mixture.
02
Co-loading of each species inferred indirectly from flux, not measured on the solid.
03
Filler batches vary; the membrane only reveals it late.

The direct read

Choose the filler on what it holds in the working mixture.

We read the filler's uptake directly in the working mixture and rank fillers on total uptake weighed on the solid. When you need to know which species, an orthogonal HPLC or UV-Vis check runs alongside.

Total uptake on each filler, in the working mixture and in clean solution.

The proof

Anchored to granted IP and peer-reviewed work.

The peer-reviewed work this rests on, linked so you can read it yourself. The patents covering the method live on the science page.

10.5772/intechopen.1013520

How we start

A feasibility check, then a use case defined with you.

Start a feasibility check

1Send 3–5 samples
2We run direct liquid-phase tests
3You get loading / release + ranking
4Together we define the use case

Ready when you are

See what's really on the solid for membranes.

Start with a feasibility check. We tell you whether the method fits your material, and work out the use case together.

Book a sorption study Talk to the lab