Rank a library against your analyte, one calibration per material.

High-throughput discovery · PMC-1 / EMC-2 (paramagnetic)

The indirect method

Three places the by-difference number lets you down.

01
Discovery campaigns bottlenecked by slow, per-material liquid measurement.
02
Promising hits lost in noisy by-difference data.
03
Hard to compare materials on a common, direct footing.

The direct read

Send the next round to the hits your analyte actually picks.

Calibrate once per material, then read loading directly across the whole set and rank it against your analyte by what each material actually captures. The next round goes to the candidates that earned it.

One screening pass across the whole library, shaded by directly-read loading.

The proof

Anchored to granted IP and peer-reviewed work.

The peer-reviewed work behind this field, linked so you can read it yourself. The patents covering the method live on the science page.

10.5772/intechopen.1013520 10.1002/cmtd.202500031

How we start

A feasibility check, then a use case defined with you.

Start a feasibility check

1Send 3–5 samples
2We run direct liquid-phase tests
3You get loading / release + ranking
4Together we define the use case

Ready when you are

See what's really on the solid for high-throughput discovery.

Start with a feasibility check. We tell you whether the method fits your material, and work out the use case together.

Book a sorption study Talk to the lab